Tom Ogden and Will Harman succeed in PPE contract claim

News & Judgments
5 September 2022

Last week the High Court handed down judgment dismissing an $11 million claim relating to PPE procurement for the NHS at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved important issues for PPE claims and sale of goods disputes more generally including the status of intermediaries, imputation of knowledge and the effect of a pro forma invoice.

The claimant claimed to have entered into a binding contract in May 2020 for the sale and purchase of 110 million surgical face masks with the defendant for onward sale to the Department of Health and Social Care. Following a trial across five days in January and February 2022, HHJ Halliwell (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) held that no binding contract had been formed, including on the basis that an individual ‘broker’ who had passed information between the parties acted as a dual agent whose knowledge that the defendant did not intend to enter into a binding agreement was to be imputed to the claimant.

Thomas Ogden and William Harman acted for the successful defendant. The judgment is available here.

Related areas

Related People

Thomas Ogden

Call: 2008

William Harman

Call: 2016



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)