Dreamvar - revolution or reprise? Has anything really changed? by Nicole Sandells QC and Nick Broomfield of 4 New Square.

MX1 Ltd v Farahzad - Matthew Bradley analyses the latest in a line of decisions concerning the proper pleading of conspiracy claims. First published by LexisNexis on 14 May 2018.

Matthew Bradley analyses the decision of Mr Justice Andrew Baker in the Commercial Court to dismiss a serious irregularity challenge to a LCIA tribunal’s award for failure to deal with all the issues that were put to it.

The penultimate instalment in 4 New Square’s GDPR series- what happens when professionals get their GDPR advice wrong? Inevitably it will transpire that mistakes will have been made by professionals giving (often very expensive) guidance on GDPR compliance. Their clients will want to consider whether a claim for professional negligence can be made. In this article Neil Hext QC, Stephen Innes and Helen Evans of 4 New Square discuss some of the issues which are likely to arise in such claims.

The Commercial Court has recently criticised the practice that is commonly adopted for presenting challenges under sections 67 & 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996.  Ben Elkington QC and Rick Liddell review the decision: