Supreme Court Uphold and Reinforce SAAMCO: BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21

News & Judgments
22 March 2017

The decision of the Supreme Court in BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21 is of great interest and importance to those concerned with claims against professionals. Roger Stewart QC and Scott Allen appeared for the Respondents. David Halpern QC and Adam Chichester-Clark represented the Appellant. The latter’s challenge to the decision of the House of Lords in SAAMCO, based on a considerable body of academic criticism and the extra-curricular writings of Lord Hoffmann was unsuccessful. Dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court both clarified the decision in SAAMCO and held that, where a defendant’s duty was to provide part of the information on which another would base a decision, that defendant was only liable for the consequences of the information being wrong, no matter how critical it had been to the decision making process. Cases which had adopted a different approach were overturned.

For a full analysis of the decision, please click here to read a note by Mark Cannon QC and Scott Allen.

Click here to read an article looking at the implications of the decision



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)