“Lost Litigation”: what is the loss and how do you quantify it?

7 April 2020

The Supreme Court has had two chances to bring some much needed clarity to these questions, but has ducked them. This podcast with the late Mark Cannon QC and Hugh Evans, provides the answers.

  • Subscribe to our podcast:

In this podcast the late Mark Cannon QC and Hugh Evans discuss how courts assess and should assess damages for lost litigation.  They do so against the background of two recent decisions of the Supreme Court in Perry v. Raleys [2019] UKSC 5 and Edwards v. Hugh James Ford Simey (A Firm) [2019] UKSC 54, decisions which brought some clarity to an area of law which has become vexed with difficulties and technicalities, but left many issues unresolved.  By focussing on the overarching principles governing the assessment of damages Mark and Hugh both explain the decisions of the Supreme Court and show how other unresolved questions should be answered.

This podcast is aimed at all those who act for lawyers and their former clients when earlier litigation has gone wrong and to provide practical guidance soundly anchored on the guiding principles.


Click here to download the lost litigation handout.

Related areas


Hugh Evans

Call: 1987



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)