Court of Appeal rules on proper test for enforcing letters of credit

News & Judgments
26 January 2017

The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in NIDCO v Banco Santander. NIDCO had sought enforcement by way of summary judgment of four letters of credit worth over US$38 million issued in its favour by Santander. Although previously ordered by Knowles J. in the Commercial Court to pay NIDCO’s demands, the bank appealed, alleging that the High Court had applied the wrong test and that the demands made by NIDCO were fraudulent. The Court of Appeal dismissed the bank’s appeal, holding that even if the test applied in the Commercial Court was too lenient, there was no evidence to support the bank’s allegations of fraud in relation to the demands. The judgment clarifies the law as to the proper test to be applied on summary judgment applications by beneficiaries under letters of credit.

Hugh Saunders of 4 New Square, led by Anneliese Day QC of Fountain Court, represented NIDCO, instructed by Simon Tolson and Claire King of Fenwick Elliott LLP.

Click here to see the full judgment



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)