Responsibility for hazardous sporting activities: Wells v DTHORC

News & Judgments
19 May 2020

Graham Eklund KC and Stephen Innes of 4 New Square, instructed by Bruce Ralston and Saul Burton of Weightmans’ Birmingham Office, acted in the successful defence of a claim in which the judgment was handed down today. Tragically, the Claimant suffered life-changing injuries in an accident on an off-road motorcycle experience day. The judge dismissed the claim against the organiser of the event, finding that the Claimant had not proved that the accident was caused by a hidden obstruction (a submerged rock in a puddle). He went on to find that if it had been, this would not have fallen within the duty owed by the Defendant to the Claimant, since it was a risk which was both inherent in the activity which participants accepted and a warning was not required because the risk was sufficiently obvious to a rider of the Claimant’s experience. 

Related People

Stephen Innes

Call: 2000



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)