Lionel Nichols, FCIArb

Call 2008 (Australia); 2013 (England & Wales)

Legal 500

“His quick understanding and appreciation, thoughtful questions, careful explanations, clever and clear drafting, and collaborative approach to the development of case strategy are impressive.”

Save to portfolio

Contact details

l.nichols@4newsquare.com

VAT number: 181469291

Clerk: Andrew Call

a.call@4newsquare.com

+442078222038

Lionel Nichols is a leading junior specialising in international and cross-border disputes, with a practice spanning commercial litigation, international arbitration and public international law. He is regularly instructed in high-value, complex matters, acting for States, corporations and individuals before the English courts and a wide range of international tribunals.

Lionel initially qualified as a solicitor in Australia in 2008, practising in commercial litigation, before transferring to the English Bar in 2013.

Lionel graduated with a triple first (Law, Politics, and Philosophy) and a Master of International Politics from the University of Tasmania before being awarded a Rhodes scholarship to study at the University of Oxford where he graduated with a Bachelor of Civil Law, a Master of International Politics and a Doctor of Philosophy in Law.

Lionel also sits as an arbitrator and is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.

A selection of Lionel’s experience is provided below. More comprehensive information is available on request.

Privacy Policy

Click here for a Privacy Policy for Lionel Nichols.

Transparency Statement

Click here for a Transparency Statement for Lionel Nichols.

Areas of expertise

Lionel practises in commercial dispute resolution, with a focus on High Court litigation involving complex, international and multi-jurisdictional disputes. He has experience acting in disputes across a range of areas, including finance, civil fraud and general commercial matters, including:

Contractual disputes, including of warranty claims and claims concerning the sale and supply of goods and services.
Company disputes, such as disputes under SPAs and SHAs, partnership and shareholder disputes, and claims against directors.
Arbitration claims, including challenges to arbitral awards (ss 67, 68, 69), applications for stays of proceedings (s 9), preliminary determinations of jurisdictions (s 32) and applications in support of arbitration (s 44).
Injunctive relief, including freezing orders and Norwich Pharmacal orders.
Interlocutory relief, including strike out and reverse summary judgment applications, disclosure disputes and jurisdiction and service out challenges.
Private international law disputes, including jurisdictional challenges, governing law disputes, and applications for permissions to serve out of the jurisdiction.

He is instructed both as sole counsel and as part of larger teams, and is experienced in managing complex litigation from early-stage applications through to trial.

Featured Commercial Law Cases

Wall v RBS. Acting for the defendant in a £600 million claim for alleged interest rate swaps mis-selling and LIBOR manipulation.
UK Bank. Acting for the claimant in an eight-future breach of contract and professional negligence claim against a manager of pension funds.
Dutch company. Acting for a Dutch investor seeking to recover more than £70 million invested to support group claims. This multi-jurisdictional dispute involves complex issues regarding the law of assignment, champerty & maintenance, financial services law and consumer protection law.
High net worth individual. Acting for the claimant in an eight-figure professional negligence claim against his former solicitors.
His Majesty’s Government. Advising a government department in an eight-figure claim against a professional services and business consulting corporation for breaches of a master services agreement.
ING v PJSC Rosbank. Acting for the defendant in English anti suit injunctive proceedings following the defendant’s commencement of proceedings in Russia in alleged breach of an arbitration agreement.
Galkin v Semchenkova. Acting for the defendant in resisting claims in contract, misrepresentation and unjust enrichment regarding an international money transfer business.
Mars v Incom. Acting for the defendant in resisting a seven-figure claim regarding the biggest food recall in EU history.
Sputnik v Dassault Aviation. Acting for the claimant in a seven-figure aviation claim, including disputes over UK and EU sanctions.
Fishman v Grebnev and Mangazeev. Acting for a Part 20 defendant in an eight-figure dispute between Israeli, British and Russian businessmen concerning a mobile maps and navigation service with 60 million users worldwide.
Tecnomarine v Seawind. Acting for a UK company in a seven-figure dispute against an Australian company for unpaid commissions and loss of profits from wrongful termination of a distribution agreement in the luxury sporting goods sector.

Lionel has a broad international arbitration practice encompassing complex, high-value commercial disputes across multiple sectors, including financial services, energy, insurance, shipping and civil fraud. His work frequently involves cross-border disputes with parallel proceedings, and he is experienced in acting both as part of counsel teams and as sole counsel.

He is regularly instructed in arbitrations seated in major arbitral centres worldwide, including proceedings under the CIArb, HKIAC, ICC, ICSID, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and UNCITRAL Rules, as well as ad hoc arbitrations. The sectors covered by this practice include banking & financial services, commodities and international trade, and energy & infrastructure, with a focus on Africa, CIS & Russia, as well as offshore jurisdictions. He has also advised both claimants and States in relation to potential claims under bilateral and multilateral investment treaties.

His experience spans the full lifecycle of disputes, from pre-arbitration strategy and pleadings through to evidential hearings and post-award challenges and enforcement. He has acted for a diverse client base including multinational corporations, financial institutions and high-net-worth individuals, and is accustomed to working on large-scale disputes involving complex factual and legal issues.

Alongside his arbitration practice, he has significant experience of arbitration-related litigation before the English courts, including challenges to awards, applications for interim relief and enforcement proceedings. He has particular expertise in applications under the Arbitration Act 1996, including challenges under sections 67, 68 and 69, stays of proceedings under section 9, freezing injunctions under section 44 and determinations of jurisdiction under section 32.

Lionel also sits as an arbitrator and is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.

Featured International Arbitrations as Counsel

Arbitration Experience

LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant to recover a $1.3 billion claim in the logistics sector, with related proceedings in the BVI courts and the English courts concerning allegations of unlawful means conspiracy.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the respondent in a €200m LCIA arbitration in the energy sector, defending a series of contractual and tortious claims commenced by Russian State-owned bank VTB.
ICSID Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a multinational producer of fibreglass pipes, in an ICSID arbitration under the Egypt-Netherlands BIT.
LCIA Arbitration and SCC Arbitration. Acting for a UK Respondent in a sale of goods arbitration commenced by a Latvian company which raised complex issues concerning compliance with the Russian sanctions regime.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for an individual in two multi-million-dollar LCIA arbitrations regarding non-payment of performance bonuses.
HKIAC Arbitration. Acting for the claimant in a seven-figure arbitration concerning breach of warranty under a share purchase agreement.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for a leading provider of cloud-based video surveillance technology in its eight-figure claim against the company’s co-founder for breach of non-compete and non-recruitment obligations.
Expert Determination. Advising an oil & gas major regarding an expert determination and associated LCIA arbitration concerning pre-emption rights and the value of a unit interest in an offshore Nigerian oil block.
ICC Arbitration. Acting for a Bulgarian pharmaceutical company in a multi-million-Euro arbitration seated in Paris concerning breach of non-compete clauses.
LCIA Arbitration. Obtaining various orders for specific performance in a complex shareholders’ dispute, concerning a Cypriot holding company ultimately owning one of the largest open-cast coal mines in Siberia, involving alleged breaches of Braganza
LCIA Arbitration. Obtaining final anti-suit injunctive relief, restraining proceedings brought in Cyprus by the respondent, in breach of an arbitration clause in a shareholders’ agreement.
ICC Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a global investment bank, in a shareholders’ dispute against a Polish real estate company regarding the exercise of put options.
ICC Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a multi-national energy company, in a dispute involving breaches of a suite of supply agreements, including issues of force majeure.
ICC Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a multi-national energy company, in a dispute concerning the operation and interpretation of a complex series of long-term production-sharing contracts from a substantial gas field in the Far East.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a private equity fund, in a dispute concerning negligent misrepresentations made during negotiations over a share purchase agreement.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the respondent, a global steel producer, in a sale of goods dispute.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a leading medical university, in a multimillion-dollar dispute following the failure of a joint venture in Malaysia.
CIArb Arbitration. Acting for the respondent, a nursing home provider, in a dispute concerning non-payment of introducer fees.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant, a Russian metallurgical plant, in defending a sale of goods claim concerning alleged non-acceptance of iron-ore pellets.
Investment Treaty Claim. Advising investors on a potential investment treaty claim under a bilateral investment treaty with an Eastern European State.
Investment Treaty Claim. Advising Turkish investors on a potential ICSID claim under a bilateral investment treaty with a Central Asian State.
Investment Treaty Claim. Advising a multinational corporation on a potential ICSID claim against an African State.
Investment Treaty Claim. Advising on the prospects of annulling an ICSID award.

Court-Related Arbitration Experience

Kanametova v OSG. Challenge under s 67 of the Arbitration Act to an arbitral award issued by a sole arbitrator under the LCIA Rules declining jurisdiction on the basis that a contract containing the arbitration agreement had been fraudulently and dishonestly backdated.
GPF GP S.á.r.l v Poland. Successfully representing the applicant in the first set aside of an investor-State award by an English court under s 67 of the Arbitration Act.
NDK Ltd v Huo Holding Ltd. Resisting challenges to four arbitral awards under sections 67 and 68 of the Arbitration Act.
Reliance Industries v Union of India. Acting for India in successfully resisting eight challenges (under sections 67, 68 and 69 of the Arbitration Act) to a $3 billion, 700-page UNCITRAL award.
Union of India v Reliance Industries. Acting for India in commencing five challenges (and resisting a further three challenges) under sections 67, 68 and 69 of the Arbitration Act.
Specialty Magnetics Ltd v Agilent Technologies [2020] EWHC 2193 (Comm). Resisting a stay application under section 9 of the Arbitration Act.
VTB Commodities Trading DAC v JSC Antipinsky Refinery. Application under section 32 of the Arbitration Act to determine a preliminary issue of jurisdiction.
VTB Commodities Trading DAC v JSC Antipinsky Refinery. Resisting the continuation of a mandatory interlocutory injunction made in support of arbitration under section 44 of the Arbitration Act.
VTB Commodities Trading DAC v JSC Antipinsky Refinery. Jurisdictional challenge concerning the addition of Part 20 defendants through section 44 of the Arbitration Act.
Advanced Support Limited v Azimut-Benetti. Section 68 challenge regarding an LMAA tribunal’s decision to strike out a claim following the claimant’s failure to comply with a security for costs order.

Featured Arbitral Appointments

Lionel has sat as arbitrator in over a dozen arbitrations and has experience both as sole arbitrator and as part of a panel. He has more than 15 years of experience in international arbitrations, including proceedings under the CIArb, HKIAC, ICC, ICSID, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and UNCITRAL Rules, as well as ad hoc arbitration. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and a member of the London Court of International Arbitration.

Recent experience includes:

Ad hoc Arbitration. Sole arbitrator in company dispute concerning alleged breach of directors’ duties and fiduciary duties
UNCITRAL Sole arbitrator in a partnership dispute.
CIArb Arbitration. Sole arbitrator in a dispute concerning a debt claim.
CIArb Arbitration. Sole arbitrator in a contractual dispute.
CIArb Arbitration. Sole arbitrator in a dispute in the financial services sector.
CIArb Arbitration. Sole arbitrator in a series of consolidated arbitrations concerning loan agreements.

Lionel is one of London’s most experienced juniors in public international law. His broad practice includes advising individuals, NGOs and States on all aspects of public international law, including:

Treaty interpretation and application
State and diplomatic immunities
Jurisdiction and admissibility
State responsibility
International human rights law
International criminal law
International humanitarian law
International environmental law
Law of the sea

On 1 January 2026, Lionel was appointed to the Attorney General’s ‘B’ Panel for Public International Law and is currently serving a five-year term.

Lionel’s experience includes acting as Geoffrey Robertson KC’s first-choice junior on all aspects of public international law. In addition to casework, Lionel provided research assistance on numerous academic titles, including Crimes against Humanity, The Case of the Pope, An Inconvenient Genocide, Mullahs Without Mercy and Who Owns History?

He holds two master’s degrees in international law, a master’s degree in international relations, and a doctorate in international law which was examined by Professor Dapo Akande. Prior to joining Chambers, Lionel was the Global Justice Research Fellow at the University of Oxford. He has published widely in the field of public international law and is regularly invited to speak at conferences. He is the author of The International Criminal Court and the End of Impunity in Kenya.

Lionel is currently advising the Norfolk Island Government in its attempts to obtain the status of non-self-governing territory under Chapter XI of the United Nations Charter.

Featured Public International Law Cases

International Court of Justice

European State. Advising on a possible third-party intervention in an ongoing case before the International Court of Justice.
African State. Advising on the possibility of seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice.

United Nations Human Rights Committee

Buffett v Australia. Application regarding the rights of Norfolk Islands to self-determination, indigenous rights, minority rights, the right to vote, the right to freedom of expression and the right to health.
Marshall v Australia; George v Australia. Application on behalf of the “Stranded Aussies” who were prevented by the Australian government from returning to their home country due to COVID-19 policies.
Tsvetnenko v Australia. Habeas corpus application regarding an Australian court’s refusal to grant bail to a defendant awaiting extradition.
Kazal v Australia. Application under Article 14 of the ICCPR (right to a fair trial) following an individual’s finding of corruption on the basis that he “could have” engaged in the conduct in question.
AJL20 v Australia. Advising a Syrian refugee on a potential habeas corpus application to the United Nations Human Rights Committee concerning breaches of the ICCPR arising from Australia’s indefinite detention regime.

International Criminal Law

Prosecutor v Taylor. The “Blood Diamond” trial of the president of Liberia, convicted of 11 counts of aiding and abetting war crimes and crimes against humanity, and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment by the Special Court for Sierra Leone.
Prosecutor v Karadžić. Trial of the president of the Republika Srpska, convicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and sentenced to 40 years imprisonment.
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Simatović. Trial of the head and deputy head of the Serbian State Security Service, convicted of war crimes and sentenced by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia to 12 years imprisonment.
Prosecutor v Gotovina. Trial of three defendants, including the commander of the Croatian army, for nine counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity alleged to have been committed during Operation Storm.
Public International Law Policy Group. Advising on genocide and crimes against humanity concerning the mass displacement and persecution of the Rohingya in Burma.
Public International Law Policy Group. Advising on the legality of the detention of suspected ISIS fighters in Iraq under public international law, including Common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions.
Global Campaign for the Prevention of Aggression. Advising this private organisation established by Benjamin Ferencz on various matters concerning Article 2(4) of the UNCharter and the crime of aggression under the Rome Statute.
Reprieve. Advising on international humanitarian law issues arising from the “War on Terrorism”.
The International Criminal Court and the End of Impunity in Kenya. Author of a monograph on the ICC’s attempts to prosecute the former president and the former prime minister of Kenya for crimes against humanity arising out of Kenya’s 2008 post-election violence.
Is a Failure to Act on Climate Change a Crime against Humanity? Author of an article published by the University of Oxford on the legal processes and merits of the ICC prosecuting senior oil and gas executives for crimes against humanity.
David Hicks: Prisoner of War or Prisoner of the War on Terror? Author of an article published by the Australian Journal of International Law on the application of international humanitarian law to an Australian detained at Guantanamo Bay.

European Court of Human Rights

Chiragov v Armenia. Application to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and raising issues of the right to property, the right to private and family life, and freedom from discrimination.
Chagos Islanders v United Kingdom. Advising on an application that raised issues over indigenous rights, minority rights and decolonisation.
Hutchinson v United Kingdom. Application under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (prohibition of torture) concerning the imposition of “whole life” sentences.
Ali v United Kingdom. Application under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning adverse pre-trial publicity in jury trials and its impact on the accused’s right to a fair trial.
Dallas v United Kingdom. Juror’s application under Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights (no punishment without law) following her conviction for contempt of court for conducting independent research into the criminal trial.

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Tuweni v Kenya. The first extraordinary rendition case to be heard by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, with associated claims relating to torture, fair trial, liberty, discrimination and the right to family life.
African Commission on Human & Peoples’ Rights. Advising on amendments to the African Charter and the Rules of Procedure to facilitate the amicable settlement of disputes.
Amnesty International. Advising on a potential application to the African Commission on Human & Peoples’ Rights concerning enforced disappearances in Burundi.

Investment Treaty Arbitrations

Future Pipe International v Egypt. Acting for the claimant, a multinational producer of fibreglass pipes, in an ICSID arbitration under the Egypt-Netherlands BIT.
Sudapet v South Sudan. Acting for the claimant in a $1 billion ICSID arbitration concerning the expropriation of its interests in various oil blocks.
Confidential client. Advising investors on a potential investment treaty claim under a BIT with an Eastern European State.
Turkish investors. Advising on a potential ICSID claim under a BIT with a Central Asian State.
Dutch investors. Advising on a potential ICSID claim against an African State.
UK Multinational Company. Advising on existing investment protections under Iranian BITs, the OIC agreement and FIPPA.
European Investors. Advising on existing investment protections under Middle Eastern BITs.

Domestic Courts

Pham v SSHD. United Kingdom Supreme Court case concerning statelessness following the Secretary of State’s decision to deprive the appellant of British nationality.
Litvinenko v SSHD. Judicial review of the Secretary of State’s refusal to set up a statutory inquiry into the death of Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko, with reference to the United Kingdom’s positive obligations under Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights to protect and promote the right to life.
GPF GP S.á.r.l v Poland. Successfully representing the applicant in the first set aside of an investor-State award by an English court under s 67 of the Arbitration Act in a case involving treaty interpretation.
Asylum Aid. Assisting individuals in the United Kingdom in making applications to the Home Office to be recognised as stateless.
Cotton Tree Trust. Advising on the regime of “immigration bail” applicable to asylum seekers.
Ministry of Justice, Lord Avery and Baroness Thornton. Advising on caste discrimination and the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Convention to Eliminate Racial Discrimination.
Reprieve. Advising on case law relevant to death row applications in the United States.
Reprieve. Advising on the application of the Alien Tort Statute, the Torture Victims Protection Act and the Exceptions Regime to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

Lionel’s extensive experience and expertise in commercial litigation, human rights, public international law and private international law have him uniquely placed to act on ESG, business & human rights and climate change matters. He has experience in matters involving:

Claims arising from corporate human rights abuses, including group claims against parent companies for conduct of their overseas subsidiaries.
Environmental and climate-related claims, including allegations of greenwashing.
Supply chain liability, including modern slavery and forced labour issues.
Corporate governance, fraud and regulatory risk.

Lionel’s recent experience includes:

Advising an international environmental NGO in a forthcoming climate change case against an international energy company.
Advising African communities in a forthcoming case against a UK-domiciled parent company of a multinational corporation.
Advising an African NGO in a forthcoming climate change case against an international energy company.

Lionel’s recent ESG publications include:

Climate Change on the Board: Navigating Directors’ Duties. An article published by the Journal of Corporate Law Studies that considers the circumstances in which an English court may hold directors liable for failing to address climate change risks.
ClientEarth v Shell PLC: What lies ahead for the derivative claim procedure in ESG litigation?
Is a Failure to Act on Climate Change a Crime against Humanity? An article published by the University of Oxford on the legal processes and merits of the ICC prosecuting senior oil and gas executives for crimes against humanity.

Lionel has also served as an expert reviewer in a comparative study conducted by the University of Oxford’s Bonavero Institute of Human Rights on civil liability for human rights violations across 18 jurisdictions.

Lionel is regularly asked to advise on sanctions issues. He has experience in advising clients on all aspects of sanctions law across the UN, EU and UK frameworks, particularly in the context of financial sanctions and export control. He also advises clients in relation to potential sanctions challenges.

Recent experience includes:

LCIA Arbitration and SCC Arbitration. Acting for a UK Respondent in a sale of goods arbitration commenced by a Latvian company which raised complex issues concerning compliance with the Russian sanctions regime.
Sputnik v Dassault Aviation. Acting for the claimant in a seven-figure aviation claim, including disputes over UK and EU sanctions.
English law firm. Advising on the interrelationship between UN, EU and UK sanctions on Iran and the scope of OFSI’s general licence for legal services.
Offshore entities. Advising on whether they are subject to UK sanctions on the basis that they are owned or controlled by a designated person.
Russian airline. Advising on the scope of UK and EU sanctions, and applying to OFSI for a licence.
Russian airline. Advising on EU and UN sanctions on Afghanistan and Iran.
Confidential client. Advising on EU Iranian sanctions.
Confidential client. Application to OFSI for a licence to unblock bank accounts on humanitarian grounds.
Oil & gas major. Advising on EU Crimea sanctions.

Lionel advises and acts for various stakeholders in litigation relating to all forms of the law and practice of insolvency and is regularly instructed to appear in the Insolvency & Companies Court.

He has experience acting for and advising companies, private individuals, partnerships, LLPs and insolvency practitioners on all aspects of corporate and personal insolvency including administration, bankruptcy, liquidation, winding-up petitions and applications to set aside statutory demands. Reflecting his broader practice, Lionel is particularly sought after for cases with an international or offshore dimension.

He is also regularly involved in shareholder disputes, unfair prejudice petitions, derivative claims, litigation arising out of corporate transactions and matters involving corporate governance and directors’ duties.

Recent experience includes:

Vesnin v Queeld. Application for recognition at common law of a Russian bankruptcy order concerning the bankruptcy of Dmitry Ananyev and limited assistance in the collection and distribution of the bankrupt’s assets.
Mispare v Eurasia. Dispute concerning the construction of a Tomlin order in the context of a complex cross-border insolvency.
Vesnin v Queeld. Appearing in the Court of Appeal in the leading judgment on the issue of standing to oppose the recognition of a foreign bankruptcy order at common law.
Confidential client. Advising on an application under the CBIR for recognition of a Russian bankruptcy order.

Lionel is regularly instructed in jurisdiction challenges in both the English courts and in international arbitration.

Within litigation, Lionel has experience in dealing with matters involving the Brussels I Regulation (and the associated Brussels and Lugano Conventions) on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments, challenges on forum non conveniens grounds, and Rome I and Rome II regulations on the law application to contracts and to non-contractual obligations.

In international arbitration, Lionel is an expert in jurisdictional challenges both before arbitral tribunals but also under sections 9, 32, and 67 of the Arbitration Act.

Recent experience includes:

GPF GP S.á.r.l v Poland. Successfully representing the applicant in the first set aside of an investor-State award by an English court under section 67 of the Arbitration Act. The court concluded that the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction after considering the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the BIT’s travaux préparatoires in interpreting the BIT’s expropriation and fair and equitable treatment provisions.
NDK Ltd v Huo Holding Ltd. Successfully resisting jurisdictional challenges to four arbitral awards under section 67 of the Arbitration Act.
Reliance Industries v Union of India. Acting for India in successfully resisting a jurisdictional challenge to an arbitral award under section 67 of the Arbitration Act.
Union of India v Reliance Industries. Acting for India in commencing a jurisdictional challenge to an arbitral award under section 67 of the Arbitration Act.
VTB v Antipinsky Refinery. Application under section 32 of the Arbitration Act to determine a preliminary issue of jurisdiction.
VTB v Antipinsky Refinery. Successful jurisdictional challenge concerning the addition of Part 20 defendants through section 44 of the Arbitration Act.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant in asserting jurisdiction (and resisting a jurisdictional challenge) based on the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
LCIA Arbitration. Acting for the claimant in resisting a jurisdictional challenge based on the alleged backdating of a contract containing the arbitration agreement.
Galkin v Semchenkova. Challenging the jurisdiction of the English courts on forum non conveniens ground.
Confidential client. Advising on prospects of resisting a likely jurisdictional challenge by a UK parent company on forum non conveniens grounds.

Contact details

l.nichols@4newsquare.com

VAT number: 181469291

Clerk: Andrew Call

a.call@4newsquare.com

+442078222038

Accreditations

Legal 500
“His quick understanding and appreciation, thoughtful questions, careful explanations, clever and clear drafting, and collaborative approach to the development of case strategy are impressive.”

Legal 500

Commercial Litigation

Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

DPhil in Law (University of Oxford)

MPhil in Law (Dist.) (University of Oxford)

BCL (University of Oxford)

Master of International Politics (University of Tasmania)

Bachelor of Laws (1st) (University of Tasmania)

Bachelor of Arts (1st) (University of Tasmania)

Rhodes Scholarship, Commonwealth Scholarship, Tim Hawkins Memorial Scholarship

Related Resources

News & Judgments

Lionel Nichols and Emile Simpson Appointed to Attorney General’s Public International Law Panel

Four New Square Chambers are delighted to announce the appointment of two…

Discover more

Past Events

London Arbitration Week: Efficient and Effective Resolution of Complex International Arbitrations: What Should Clients Expect?

4th December 2025
8:30am - 10am BST

Four New Square Chambers are hosting the panel event, “Efficient and Effective…

Discover more

Past Events

4 New Square Chambers at London Arbitration Week 2025

1st December 2025 - 5th December 2025

Four New Square Chambers are Gold Sponsors of London Arbitration Week 2025….

Discover more

Articles & Publications

Is a Failure to Act on Climate Change a Crime against Humanity?

Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established to try those most…

Discover more

Articles & Publications

ClientEarth V Shell PLC: What lies ahead for the derivative claim procedure in ESG litigation?

1. The Court of Appeal has recently refused ClientEarth’s application for permission…

Discover more

News & Judgments

Lionel Nichols meets Norfolk Island delegation to advise on international law and human rights issues

On 14 November 2023, 4 New Square’s Lionel Nichols met with a…

Discover more

Past Events

Climate Litigation Unleashed: Lionel Nichols to speak at expert workshop

22nd November 2023

4 New Square Chambers’ Lionel Nichols will speak at a one-day expert…

Discover more

Articles & Publications

Commercial litigation concerns and trends – autumn 2023

4 New Square’s commercial litigation networking breakfast provided a useful forum to…

Discover more

Past Events

Lionel Nichols and Paul Fisher to speak at English Law Day in Armenia

8th June 2023

We are delighted that 4 New Square Chambers’ Lionel Nichols and Paul…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Call

+44 (0)20 7822 2000

Email

general@4newsquare.com

4 New Square Chambers

4 New Square
Lincoln's Inn
London, WC2A 3RJ

D +44 20 7822 2000
M general@4newsquare.com

BARRISTERS REGULATED BY
THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD

Sign up to our mailing list

Register

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement	1 year	Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent	1 year	Records the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
wp_law_pdfbuilder_bespoke	1 Year	Used for the portfolio builder
wp_law_pdfbuilder_list	1 Year	Used for the portfolio builder

Cookie	Duration	Description
__cf_bm	30 minutes	Cookie is used by CloudFlare to read and filter requests from bots
wfwaf-authcookie*	1 day	Cookie is used by Wordfence to read to determine if the user is logged in

Cookie	Duration	Description
_ga	2 years	The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_ga_DJZVZPQ3PF	2 years	This cookie is installed by Google Analytics.
_gat_gtag_UA_196640177_1	1 minute	Set by Google to distinguish users.
_gid	1 day	Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
_hjSessionUser_*	1 year	Cookie is used by Hotjar to store a unique user ID.
cf_clearance	6 months	The cf_clearance cookie is required for JavaScript detections. JavaScript detections are stored in the cf_clearance cookie.

Lionel Nichols, FCIArb

Contact details

Clerk: Andrew Call

Areas of expertise

Commercial Law

International Arbitration

Public International Law

ESG

Sanctions

Company & Insolvency

Jurisdiction

Contact details

Clerk: Andrew Call

Accreditations

The Directories

Qualifications & Memberships

Related Resources

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Call

Email

4 New Square Chambers

Sign up to our mailing list

Search