In seminal case on litigation funding, Supreme Court overturns established practice to hold that Litigation Funding Agreements are Damages-Based Agreements
Robert Marven KC and George McDonald consider the decision and its consequences….
George McDonald has a broad commercial practice, with a particular focus on construction and costs litigation.
George is nominated for Group Litigation Junior of the Year in the Legal 500 Bar Awards 2024 and is ranked as a Leading Junior by Chambers & Partners, Legal 500 and Who’s Who Legal. They quote solicitors:
George has considerable experience of construction disputes, and in particular cases relating to government contracts. Examples of George’s work include:
George also acts on general commercial matters, including international arbitration, professional negligence, IT and telecommunications, financial services and insurance disputes. Examples of George’s work include:
George spent 3 months in Hong Kong for the prestigious Pegasus Scholarship, which included helping the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre with a number of construction arbitrations and drafting guidance to be published on their arbitration rules.
In costs, George has been instructed on some of the seminal costs cases, both on his own account and as a junior. George has particular experience of group litigation and class/representative actions, including:
George also has considerable experience of dealing with the costs of media litigation, including as cost counsel for the Mirror Newspaper in the phone hacking group litigation and for the BBC in the well-publicised claim by Sir Cliff Richard for invasion of privacy. He is instructed by some of the leading media outlets, including Express Newspapers, Associated Newspapers, News Group Newspapers, Mirror Group Newspapers, BBC, Channel 4 and Channel 5.
George also acts in important cases for costs litigation or that are in the public eye. Examples are the Debenhams insolvency litigation; the “X passports” litigation against the government; a rare successful appeal on hourly rates in Kelly v Hays Plc [2015] EWHC 735 (QB); the novel points of law relating to costs budgets in the leading case of Elvanite v AMEC Earth & Environmental (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1643 (TCC); the important solicitor-client dispute of Assaubayev v Michael Wilson & Partners, Ltd with Nicholas Bacon KC in the Court of Appeal; for William Hill in the assessment of Betfair’s costs for the judicial review of the Horseracing Levy; as sole counsel in the Court of Appeal on the seminal case on interest and Part 36 offers, King v City of London Corporation.
George also advises on all aspects of litigation funding. He advises solicitors, third party funders, ATE providers and clients about the relevant structures. He has put together the funding documents in many of the major pieces of group litigation and class actions involving third party funding. George also advised on one of the largest UK mergers of solicitors’ firms and appeared as sole counsel for a third party funder in a claim for over £1 billion.
In other matters, for 3 months in late 2009 George went on secondment to the Financial Services Authority, in their General Counsel’s Division. George advised the FSA on the implementation of recent amending EU Directives (in particular to the Capital Adequacy Directive and the Banking Consolidation Directive) and drafted the relevant text for the FSA’s amended Handbook. George was also Judicial Assistant to Lord Justice Dyson in the Court of Appeal for two terms in 2009.
For his education, George originally studied Mathematics and Philosophy at Worcester College, Oxford University. He obtained a first in his Honour Moderations and was awarded a Worcester College Scholarship. He subsequently changed to read Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (‘PPE’) and graduated with a first, completing the full degree in two years. George thereafter took the CPE and BVC and is a member of Lincoln’s Inn, where he received the Hardwicke and Shelford Scholarships.
Click here for a Privacy Policy for George McDonald.
Transparency Statement
Click here for a Transparency Statement for George McDonald.
George does a large amount of drafting, advisory, and advocacy work in this field. He acts for claimants/defendants in claims involving all types of professionals, including solicitors/barristers, construction professionals, surveyors/valuers, financial services professionals, and estate agents.
Featured Professional Negligence cases
George has considerable experience of both domestic and international general commercial matters, including international arbitration, professional negligence, information technology and telecommunications, financial services, construction and engineering and insurance disputes.
Featured Commercial Litigation cases
“George McDonald is an absolute superstar – very commercial and technically superb.” – Chambers & Partners
“George is an excellent communicator. He identifies the weaknesses in his opponents arguments and holds them to task.” – Legal 500
“George McDonald is very good on his feet when advocating. He is able to put more experienced senior counsel to shame based on his technical knowledge and ability to grasp difficult information.” “He gets to the detail very quickly, gives commercially sound advice and is very responsive.” “He is bright and easy to work with. George is a highly user-friendly, clear and concise advocate.” “George McDonald really comes into his own in hearings and judges are impressed with him.” – Chambers & Partners
“George is outstanding, his attention to detail is second to none. He is simply one of the best.” – Legal 500
“His attention to detail and drive to get to the heart of issues is always impressive.” – Legal 500
“He is exceptionally bright and able to get right to the nub of the issue very quickly. In relation to client care he goes above and beyond.” – Chambers & Partners
“Exceptional knowledge on costs issues. Full of bright ideas and not afraid to suggest and try innovative solutions. An infectious enthusiasm for the task in hand.” – Legal 500
“A very confident advocate who is absolutely brilliant. He’s quick, highly responsive and someone who provides very good, clear advice.” “His written work is excellent and he’s very good on his feet.” “George provides trenchant, commercial advice which is exceptionally well drafted.” – Chambers & Partners
George is widely regarded as one of the best junior counsel for costs litigation. He has been ranked as a leading junior in this area by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 for a number of years. He has been instructed in some of the seminal costs cases before a number of different tribunals, including on his own account in Supreme Court and Privy Council assessments.
George has particular experience of group litigation and class/representative actions.
Featured Costs & Litigation Funding cases
George has considerable experience of dealing with the costs of media litigation, including as cost counsel for the Mirror Newspaper in the phone hacking litigation and for the BBC in the well-publicised claim by Sir Cliff Richard for invasion of privacy. He is instructed by some of the leading media outlets, including Express Newspapers, Associated Newspapers, News Group Newspapers, Mirror Group Newspapers, BBC, Channel 4 and Channel 5.
George also acts in important cases for costs litigation or that are in the public eye. Examples are the Debenhams insolvency litigation; the “X passports” litigation against the government; a rare successful appeal on hourly rates in Kelly v Hays Plc [2015] EWHC 735 (QB); the novel points of law relating to costs budgets in the leading case of Elvanite v AMEC Earth & Environmental (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1643 (TCC); the important solicitor-client dispute of Assaubayev v Michael Wilson & Partners, Ltd with Nicholas Bacon KC in the Court of Appeal; for William Hill in the assessment of Betfair’s costs for the judicial review of the Horseracing Levy; as sole counsel in the Court of Appeal on the seminal case on interest and Part 36 offers, King v City of London Corporation.
A large part of George’s practice is drafting and advisory work for litigation funding, solicitor’s retainers and ATE providers. He has put together the funding documents in many of the major pieces of group litigation and class actions involving third party funding.
George also advised on one of the largest UK mergers of solicitors’ firms, acted on some of the leading cases relating to assignments (including Griffiths v Paragon Personal Finance Limited and Budana v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), and appeared as sole counsel for a third party funder in a claim for over £1 billion (named as one of the Lawyer’s “Cases of the Year” in 2018).
George is regularly instructed to deal with costs budgeting and attend detailed assessments, both inter-partes and solicitor-client, and is well versed in the issues that arise. Such issues recently include: the enforceability of CFAs and recoverability of ATE premiums and legitimacy of general funding agreements, departing from budgets on an assessment, the impact of consumer protection legislation on solicitor’s retainers, the proper application of the fixed costs regime and the RTA protocol, transitional issues relating to the Jackson reforms and the recoverable fees in court of protection matters.
George is the contributing editor of Butterworths Costs Service quarterly bulletin, drafted the Lexis Nexis PSL Costs Practice Notes, and his written a number of articles for the Costs Lawyer.
“George instils immediate confidence in his ability. He has laser-like focus in cross-examination and is unflappable when under pressure.” – Chambers & Partners
“George is very bright. He is particularly good at cases where there is an element of data interpretation required, and at reviewing the evidence with experts. Clients and solicitors like him for his amiable charm.”– Legal 500
“He is particularly good at disputes which require analysis of data, where his mathematical background is undoubtedly an asset.” “His advice has been to the point and commercial and can be used by the client effectively in making their decisions.” “George gets the key issues quickly, advises clearly and is extremely good both on paper and on his feet.” “He knows the relevant law in this area inside and out and he gives robust and clear advice.” – Chambers & Partners
“George is a stand-out junior; immensely clever and likeable.” – Legal 500
“A brilliant lawyer and a match for many QCs in his written submissions. He has extensive knowledge of the law and understands the technical issues as well as the experts. A go to.” –Legal 500
“He has an excellent knowledge of the law and understands the technical issues that no one else does.” – Chambers & Partners
“George is a stunningly intelligent and incredibly personable guy.” – Legal 500
George has considerable experience of construction disputes, including those with an international element. He is ranked as a leading junior in Who’s Who Legal, who describes George as:
“Immensely clever”, “excellent on his feet and on paper” and “extremely easy to work with”, George “achieves fantastic results” (WWL 2018). “The “absolutely exceptional” George McDonald is an expert on a wide range of construction matters, including PFI disputes”.
Featured Construction & Engineering cases
He has extensive experience of a wide range of dispute resolution procedures, including adjudication, expert determination, arbitration and litigation under a variety of different rules and procedures.
George is familiar with all the principal standard forms of contracts used in construction projects. He is particularly adept at dealing with difficult technical issues given his scientific and mathematical background.
George spent 3 months in Hong Kong for the prestigious Pegasus Scholarship, which included assisting the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre with a number of construction arbitrations and drafting guidance to be published on their arbitration rules.
George has built up a strong reputation in international (and domestic) commercial arbitrations. He has been involved in a range of disputes in the construction, energy, financial services, legal services, and insurance sectors. These have been conducted under various rules (e.g. LCIA, ICC, UNCITRAL and HKIAC) as well as ad hoc arbitrations.
By way of example (and recognising the confidential nature of the disputes), George’s experience includes substantial construction projects in Central Europe and the Channel Islands, various disputes relating to contractors’ all-risk, professional indemnity and ATE insurance, criminal activities in the performance of legal services and the development of nuclear facilities in Scotland.
George also advises on the validity and scope of arbitration clauses, as well as potential challenges to arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act 1996 and issues relating to enforcement. He acted in the seminal case concerning the enforceability of arbitration clauses covering disputes subject to the court’s supervisory jurisdiction (which went to the Court of Appeal in Assaubeyev v Michael Wilson & Partners [2014] EWCA Civ 1491).
In addition, George has first-hand experience of the inner workings of arbitral institutions. He was awarded the renowned Pegasus Scholarship to Hong Kong, where he assisted the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) draft their new arbitration rules and commentary thereon. During his time with the HKIAC he acted as an assistant to the tribunal across a wide-range of international arbitrations, which gave him invaluable insight into the decision-making process.
George advises on a wide-range of banking and financial services disputes.
Featured Banking & Financial Services cases
With his mathematical background, George is particularly adept at grasping financial concepts and instruments.
In this podcast episode, 4 New Square Chambers’ Nicholas Bacon KC, George McDonald, and Ben…
We are delighted to announce that members of 4 New Square Chambers…
This morning the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case…
We are delighted to announce that 4 New Square Chambers has been…
5 cases involving 10 members of 4 New Square Chambers are featured…
On 20 October 2023 Jacobs J handed down judgment in Therium Litigation…
4 New Square Chambers’ George McDonald and Matt Waszak explore new representative…
Memberships – TECBAR, COMBAR, PNBA, SCL
Education – BA (Oxon)
Robert Marven KC and George McDonald consider the decision and its consequences….
Lloyd v Google marks a seminal moment for representative actions. The ramifications…
4 New Square
Lincoln's Inn
London, WC2A 3RJ
BARRISTERS REGULATED BY
THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD
Accessibility | Cookies | Disclaimer | Equality & Diversity | Privacy Policy | © 4 New Square Chambers – All Rights Reserved | Site by Tela.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
CookieLawInfoConsent | 1 year | Records the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
wp_law_pdfbuilder_bespoke | 1 Year | Used for the portfolio builder |
wp_law_pdfbuilder_list | 1 Year | Used for the portfolio builder |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_ga | 2 years | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. |
_ga_DJZVZPQ3PF | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. |
_gat_gtag_UA_196640177_1 | 1 minute | Set by Google to distinguish users. |
_gid | 1 day | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio
Title | Type | CV |
---|
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)
Need more information about the above People and Expertise?
Talk to one of our clerks: +44 (0)20 7822 2000