Resources

Privacy and Conflicts in the Court of Appeal: [2016] 132 LQR 31

Articles & Publications
19 August 2016

In this case note, Josh Folkard considers the decision of Vidal-Hall v Google, which clarifies:
– That privacy is protected in English law by a new tort of misuse of private information.
– The availability of damages for mere distress under the Data Protection Act 1998.
– The scope of the ‘tort gateway’ in Practice Direction 6B.
– That (at least some) articles of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights have horizontal direct effect.

Search

Expertise

Related resources

The Chief Constable of Sussex Police v XGY: Two doors shut, but others stay open


Introduction On 8 October 2025, Lady Carr, Dame Victoria Sharp P and…

Discover more

Graham Chapman KC succeeds in the Privy Council in long-running share valuation dispute


Maso Capital Investments Ltd v Trina Solar Ltd [2025] UKPC 48 In…

Discover more

Mazur and Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP: a brave new world for the solicitor business model?


Introduction On 16 September 2025, Sheldon J handed down judgment in Mazur…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)