Information v advice: inadequate labels but important principles

Matthew Bradley and Tom Asquith consider the recent Court of Appeal decision in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP in the context of financial advice, providing points of note for practitioners looking to draw a line between taking responsibility for a decision and merely providing information which feeds into that decision.

This article was first published in the May issue of Butterworths Journal of International Banking & Financial Law.

To view the article, please click here.

Related People

Matthew Bradley KC

Call: 2004 Silk: 2022

Tom Asquith

Call: 2007




Popular resources

Blurred boundaries: just how far do solicitors’ duties extend?

There has been a recent spate of cases where claimants have attempted…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Tom Ogden and Will Harman succeed in PPE contract claim

Last week the High Court handed down judgment dismissing an $11 million…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)