Resources

Information v advice: inadequate labels but important principles

Matthew Bradley and Tom Asquith consider the recent Court of Appeal decision in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP in the context of financial advice, providing points of note for practitioners looking to draw a line between taking responsibility for a decision and merely providing information which feeds into that decision.

This article was first published in the May issue of Butterworths Journal of International Banking & Financial Law.

To view the article, please click here.

Related People

Matthew Bradley KC

Call: 2004 Silk: 2022

Tom Asquith

Call: 2007

Search

Expertise

Related resources

Are AI and lawyers a good mix?


Legal AI is developing at a dizzying rate. In January 2025 the…

Discover more

Wasted Costs: A Whistle Stop Tour


, ,

In this article, Melody Hadfield analyses the test for wasted costs orders and provides…

Discover more

URS v BDW: what does it mean for scope of duty and contribution in professional liability?


On 21 May 2025, the Supreme Court gave judgment in URS Corporation…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)