Resources

Fortification For Damages in Freezing Injunctions

Sian Mirchandani KC writes about the decision of Moulder J in Claimants Listed in Schedule 1 v Spence [2021] EWHC 925 (Comm) to grant a request for additional fortification of the undertaking in damage. The decision had created uncertainty in applying the threshold for showing “a good arguable case” for the existence of a risk of loss. This article was first published with ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine.

Related People

Siân Mirchandani KC, FCIArb

Call: 1997 Silk: 2019

Search

Expertise

Related resources

Novitas Loans Limited V Amtrust Specialty Limited (& Ors) [2026] EWHC 592


On 16 March 2026 the Commercial Court (Mr Justice Henshaw) handed down…

Discover more

RICS AI Guidance: Responsible use of artificial intelligence in surveying practice


Keeping up with professional guidance in AI is fast becoming a full…

Discover more

AI and the Courts: The Civil Justice Council’s Consultation on Preparing Court Documents


A Civil Justice Council Working Group (the “CJC”), chaired by Lord Justice…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)