Resources

Fortification For Damages in Freezing Injunctions

Sian Mirchandani KC writes about the decision of Moulder J in Claimants Listed in Schedule 1 v Spence [2021] EWHC 925 (Comm) to grant a request for additional fortification of the undertaking in damage. The decision had created uncertainty in applying the threshold for showing “a good arguable case” for the existence of a risk of loss. This article was first published with ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine.

Click here to read the article in full

Related People

Siân Mirchandani KC, FCIArb

Call: 1997 Silk: 2019

Search

Expertise

Related resources

Gutmann v Apple – Case Note


Collective actions in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) have been beset…

Discover more

Spring Recap: Professional Liability & Regulatory Insights


Welcome to the 4 New Square Chambers’ Spring Recap; a collection of…

Discover more

White Book 2025: Costs & Funding Supplement


We are pleased to report that 4 New Square Chambers’ Roger Mallalieu…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)