Resources

Fortification For Damages in Freezing Injunctions

Sian Mirchandani KC writes about the decision of Moulder J in Claimants Listed in Schedule 1 v Spence [2021] EWHC 925 (Comm) to grant a request for additional fortification of the undertaking in damage. The decision had created uncertainty in applying the threshold for showing “a good arguable case” for the existence of a risk of loss. This article was first published with ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE Magazine.

Related People

Siân Mirchandani KC, FCIArb

Call: 1997 Silk: 2019

Search

Expertise

Related resources

Legal Professional Privilege in the Age of AI: Open Systems, Closed Systems and the Data Journey


Introduction The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence tools across the legal profession…

Discover more

Where are court rules heading in the age of AI?


In just one week there have been two different updates on the…

Discover more

Dishonesty and exceptional circumstances – Mohindru KC v BSB


In a decision handed down on 30 June 2026 ([2026] EWHC 1604…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)