Court of Appeal rules on the test of inducement in insurance non-disclosure cases

News & Judgments
4 May 2021

4 New Square on both sides of important Court of Appeal ruling on the test of inducement to be applied where an insurer seeks to avoid an insurance policy for material non-disclosure.  The Court determined that it was not enough for the insurer to show that ‘but for’ the non-disclosure it would not have entered into the policy on the same terms.  Instead the insurer had to go further and show that the non-disclosure was an efficient cause of it entering into the policy.  Graham Eklund KC, Ben Elkington KC, Carl Troman and Ben Smiley acted for the insurer and insured in the case, which is reviewed by Miles Harris here.

Click to read insurance blog post on the decision

Related areas

Related People

Ben Elkington KC, FCIArb

Call: 1996 Silk: 2012

Carl Troman

Call: 2001

Ben Smiley

Call: 2009



Popular resources

Four Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort Claims

By Carl Troman, Barrister and Mediator at 4 New Square Four key points…

Discover more

Stay of proceedings before serving a claim form

What should claimants do when limitation is about to expire? Noting…

Discover more

Why are there so many cases against lawyers for contempt of court?

There has been a spate of cases in the past couple of…

Discover more

If you would like to know more or have a question please talk to our clerks

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)