Roger has extensive experience in all areas of costs law.
He is listed as a leading junior in the field in both the Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners.
“Calm, knowledgeable, wise and determined.” – Chambers & Partners, 2018
‘A persuasive advocate, who is head and shoulders above the competition.’ – Legal 500, 2017
An ‘Incontrovertible star who enjoys a “formidable reputation” in the field as a “guru on costs.” “His written work is highly persuasive and he has the voice of a good friend talking you round. As an advocate, he is formidable and his command of the material is stunning.” “He’s good with clients, immensely likeable and is someone who engenders confidence and trust.”‘ – Chambers & Partners, 2016
Inter partes costs
Roger’s practice covers the complete range of inter partes costs matters, from representing clients on complex or high value detailed assessments, through technical arguments concerning the validity of retainers, to disputes about insurance premiums and other similar matters. Roger represents clients in such matters at all levels and appears regularly in the appellate courts.
In addition, much of Roger’s work is of an advisory nature, ensuring parties are best prepared to maximise costs recovery or seeking to lay the ground for successful challenges to the principle or quantum of costs.
Roger was involved in some of the leading cases concerning costs capping and budgeting. He also has considerable experience in dealing with security for costs applications.
Roger is regularly instructed to advise on or represent parties in litigation concerning millions of pounds in costs and is experienced in dealing with group litigation claims.
Roger regularly acts for both defendants and claimants and has been instructed in some of the most high profile costs litigation in recent years.
He has represented a wide range of clients from high street PLCs to presidents of African countries, through to music celebrities and celebrity footballers in a wide range of interesting and complex cases.
Solicitor – client costs
Roger is regularly instructed to represent solicitors seeking to recover costs from their clients and by clients seeking to resist paying such costs, in complex and high value cases. He has extensive experience in all aspects of solicitor-client matters and has a particular expert knowledge of the intricacies of the Solicitors Act 1974 in this regard.
He is also frequently instructed in cases where there is an overlap between such issues and a professional negligence claim by the client and/or professional conduct proceedings against the solicitor.
Drafting and advisory work
A significant part of Roger’s practice concerns the provision of drafting and advisory work, whether on an individual or generic basis. Roger has drafted many fee-related agreements, including conditional and collective conditional fee agreements, costs sharing agreements and similar matters, for a range of firms including large city firms and has substantial experience of advising such firms on novel and complex fee arrangements and on how to maximise solicitor-client and inter partes costs recovery.
Roger has experience in a range of other costs related areas, including costs of arbitrations, costs of administrations and receiverships and costs disputes between solicitors and counsel, including references to the Joint Tribunal. He has acted in a number of complex cases concerning applications for third party costs orders.
Examples of experience
Recent cases include:
- Sibthorpe & Morris v London Borough of Southwark (Law Society intervening) (Court of Appeal, December 2010). Roger acted for the Defendant in this second appeal to the Court of Appeal in relation to the question of the extent to which champerty and maintenance continue to restrict the scope of a solicitor’s retainer and the legality of a solicitor indemnifying a client against an adverse costs liability,. Judgment is awaited.
- In the matter of Super Aguri F1 Ltd  (full reference awaited). Roger acted for the successful joint Adminstrators in an extremely contentious application for their remuneration to be fixed and thereafter in their successful claim for the recovery of the administrators own costs, in addition to ‘legal costs’, of that application.
- Forde v Birmingham City Council  1 WLR 2732, the leading case concerning the validity of retrospective conditional fee agreements.
- Tankard v John Fredericks Plastics & others  1 WLR 1731 (CA), the Court of Appeal test cases concerning conditional fee agreements and the Accident Line Protect insurance scheme.
- Nizami v Butt  EWHC 159 (QB) concerning fixed costs in road traffic cases.
In addition, Roger has been instructed in a number of high-profile Court of Appeal cases, including a second appeal concerning the ability of solicitors to ‘insure’ their clients and a second appeal concerning the interaction of CPR Part 36 with the fixed costs rules.
Roger is regularly asked to write articles on or to lecture on costs and has written articles for the Personal Injury Law Journal, the Solicitors Journal, the Butterworths Civil Costs newsletter and the Practical Law Company amongst others.